U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito appeared inclined to side with the state of Alabama during ...
SCOTUSblog on MSN
Hamm v. Smith and the future of capital punishment
Capital Matters is a recurring series by Jordan Steiker that covers federal constitutional regulation of the death penalty ...
Seth P. Waxman, Smith’s lawyer, told the justices that the lower federal courts in his client’s case correctly applied Alabama law, which allows judges to consider “evidence of intellectual ...
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 10, heard oral argument in Hamm vs. Smith, a capital case that could reshape how courts evaluate intellectual disability under Atkins v. Virginia and its ...
Wellbeing Whisper on MSN
Supreme Court IQ ruling could redefine disability rights nationwide
Can one number determine the destiny of access for millions of Americans with intellectual disabilities? This is what is at ...
Reginald Jackson has been ruled intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for the death penalty, upholding a ...
Opinion
Alabama Begs Supreme Court to Make It Easier to Execute People With Intellectual Disabilities
The bizarre oral argument in Hamm v. Smith shows how decades of case law rooted in science is now under siege at the Supreme Court.
What are intellectual and developmental disabilities? Intellectual disability is a disability characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior, which ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results